Appraisal of evidence and control of bias in the kidney disease outcomes quality initiative guideline development process.

نویسندگان

  • David Van Wyck
  • Kai-Uwe Eckardt
  • Katrin Uhlig
  • Michael Rocco
  • Adeera Levin
چکیده

Appraisal of Evidence and Control of Bias in the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Guideline Development Process David Van Wyck,* Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Katrin Uhlig, Michael Rocco, and Adeera Levin *Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and Department of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 8–10, 2007. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02840806

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

“It’s Not Smooth Sailing”: Bridging the Gap Between Methods and Content Expertise in Public Health Guideline Development

Background The development of reliable, high quality health-related guidelines depends on explicit and transparent processes, methods aimed at minimising risks of bias and the inclusion of all relevant expertise and perspectives. While the methodological aspects of guidelines have been a focus to improve their quality, less is known...

متن کامل

Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”

Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...

متن کامل

تدوین راهنمای بالینی فرآیند تزریق خون در کودکان مبتلا به تالاسمی ماژور

  Background & Aim: The &beta-Thalassemia major is a chronic disease that needs a regular blood transfusion. The blood transfusion is a complex process with high probability of human errors during the process which results in serious adverse events in patients. Nurses should deliver care based on the best available evidence or best practice. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-base...

متن کامل

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes and CKD: 2012 Update.

The 2012 update of the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is intended to assist the practitioner caring for patients with diabetes and CKD. Substantial high-quality new evidence has emerged since the original 2007 KDOQI guideline that could significantly change recommendations for clinical practice. As suc...

متن کامل

Methods for guideline development

OVERVIEW OF PROCESS The development process for the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease included the following steps: K Appointing Work Group members and the ERT. K Discussing process, methods, and results. K Developing and refining topics. K Identifying populations, interventions or predictors, and outcomes of interest. K Selecting t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN

دوره 2 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007